Does anybody else think that Bret was in the wrong for Montreal.

[Scott Delaney]

Originally Posted by hb2k What kind of fucking stupid analogy is this?

An accurate one? Triple H used that same analogy in the past. Since Paul Levesque is a much smarter man than you, me, or Bret, I tend to respect his opinions quite highly.

Do wrestlers go through a long career of putting on good to great matches to have to summed up in a DVD called "Bret Hart: Screwed"? If anything Bret took Vince's obsession with Montreal, and changed it to something that would benefit the fans instead of having us listen to the same tired "Bret refused to lose" inaccurate crap that Vince and WWE, not Bret, were going to give us. The fact he gives a rats ass about his career and legacy that he worked hard and long for is actually a positive in someways, you know.

All this shows, is that Bret is insecure. You don't think that there are already TONS of Bret Hart matches out there on DVD/tape?

Regardless of the Montreal Screw job, Bret will be remembered as a great wrestler. He's not in the same league as HBK, Flair, Kurt Angle, or Eddie Guerrero, but he's great nonetheless. His fans know this.

Bret is doing this DVD for a few reasons:

1) His ego.

2) Money.

Nothing more, nothing less. Did I also mention that by doing this, he's completely compromising his integrity?


For a company that supposedly completely "screwed" him and wrecked his career, Bret seems awfully interested in doing business with the WWE.