Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kane Knight
Okay, since you bring this up, this is how I roll:
I have made several statements in the past on my feelings of TNA, from the glaringly negative to the beamingly positive. However, I do not feel the need to post my full opinion on TNA in every single post I make regarding TNA, nor should I have to. I should be safe from people making stupid assumptions like "He says a low rated show shouldn't go head to head with a high rated show! OMG FANBOY!"
Why? Because that defies reasonable, conventional, and logical thinking. I addressed the ratings, not even my opinions on the shows themselves. Just because I admit that Eminem sells more than Mark Erelli does not mean that I have actually said Eminem was betetr than Mark.
If the best you have to back up your assumption was "Well he didn't say he WASN'T a WWE fanboy," Then you seriously need to be hit in the head with a cinder block again (I'm assuming that's why your IQ is obviously so low).
|
You don't make any statements in this thread of that nature other than ratings. What, should I have scouted this site for like a year to become familiar with what EVERYONE has said in the past? I can only go by the posts on the thread I'm reading...which at no point gives your opinion of TNA until now. But thanks for the compliments.
02-03-2006, 07:13 PM
Threaded Mode