this years wrestlemania is MAKE IT OR BREAK IT for the WWE

[Arnold HamNegger]

Originally Posted by Vermaat THEY ARE BIASED. No one is gonna admit to what they did, to being lazy and such. The only one that needs professional help is you.

Yes, you are right. I need professional help because in an argument, I am using actual facts and documented statements from people in the wrestling industry. CLEARLY I need to have my head examined.

Originally Posted by Vermaat If there were no WWE, WCW would still be in business. Thus, my point is correct.

Dude, what the fuck is wrong with you? This is like the 3rd time I'm going to tell you that I'm not arguing that WWE didn't have a hand in WCW going out of business. That isn't the discussion, so why do you keep mentioning this? This has nothing to do with the argument, yet you are repeating it again as supposed proof that you are right? This shows that you are even confusing yourself with your bullshit. You don't even know what you are arguing anymore.

Originally Posted by Vermaat They played a role too, sure, but were not the only reason. Also, if no one cared for the nWo the first time around, wCw would have pushed them a second time around thus they listened to the fans. Sorry that you're getting upset when my argument is correct.

You keep ignoring the fact that I've told you this subject is covered in detail on a documentary DVD. The facts are on the DVD and are discussed by most all of the professionals involved, yet you continue to argue that your delusion is the truth. The fact that you keep insisting you are right when your "theory" contradicts everything discussed in a documentary made by WWE and information that is known in the wrestling industry as common knowledge is pathetic. Seriously, when you insist you are right in cases like this when you are blatently wrong, this only discredits you in any other argument on this thread. You are arguing that you are correct and WWE and WCW are incorrect with their own personal accounts as to what happened. Why can't you see that this is fucked up? And you can't just keep arguing against documented facts with ".....because my argument is correct." That seriously just proves you to be a gigantic jackass.

Originally Posted by Vermaat I caught a Nitro or two, but mostly watched WWE so I know what I saw and that was a lot of cruiserweights.

Here again with an example of you not being able to read. I said at the end there wasn't a whole lot of matches and the cruiserweights never got serious pushes throughout their entire time in WCW. Just because they have matches doesn't mean that they are being pushed. Once again, on the DVD "The Monday Night War", your own beloved Rey Rey talks in length about "WCW not wanting to make new stars and the fact that THEY NEVER GOT PUSHED." Dude, Rey Rey proves you to be wrong. Buy the DVD, watch it and shut the fuck up. Wait, what am I saying...you watched Nitro once or twice, that automatically makes you the expert. Rey is obviously biased in the interview then.


So Vermaat, I'm going to dumb myself down to your level now and use your own logic against you. Vermaat logic states, "If you don't like the biggest and best wrestling company, then you aren't a real wrestling fan."

So, by your own logic, when WCW lead the ratings against WWE for 83 consecutive weeks..nearly 2 years...you weren't a REAL wrestling fan because you didn't watch the "biggest" and "best" company. The fact that you were totally willing to watch wrestling's "2nd best company" during that time automatically discredits your opinion on the quality of wrestling today. Why should anyone take your opinion seriously? Clearly you were willing to sit through WWE "shit" back then and not even realize it. You are obviously not a good gauge for wrestling "quality", sorry. It's not my opinion, your own "logic" proves this to be correct.