Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Prog MetalHead
Sounds decent enough... but isn't Triple H a ten-time champion? And the part where you say Michaels hasn't held the title for nine years? I take it you're referring to the WWE Title, as opposed to the World Title.
Just nit-picking, but for some reason it bothers me when a wrestler says "I held the World Title four years ago, but it's been nine years since I've held the WWE Title"... I know it's scripted and all... I just thought that holding any brands top title would justify being a Champion.
In fact, that doesn't make sense... forget I said it... Good post. 
|
Yeah, that's what I meant when it would require adjusting on how the WWE markets its former World Champions. It would just need more of a distinct seperation between the WWE and World Heavyweight Championships, something I think the WWE should do anyway. Making the World Titles interchangeable kind of depletes their value a little, in my opinion.