TPWW Forums  

Go Back   TPWW Forums > w r e s t l i n g > wrestling forum

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-19-2007, 08:34 PM   #28
addy2hotty
yes. yes. yes.
 
addy2hotty's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,753
addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedamndest
Those are good points, and I doubt they would remerge anyway just because , but if they were going to, now would be the opportune time. The people they have gotten rid of probably would have been axed during a remerge (not that I agree with who was axed). The too many egos thing could actually have been a boon, not in the sense that ego is good, but in the 98-00 sense when there was a credible main event scene. And as for Batista feuding with Cena, it might work better than you would think. If Batista were given a program he actually cared about he might shake that rust that he's had ever since he got back. And Cena wouldn't have to continue with his Monster of the Month feuds. My reasoning is this: WWE is going to keep giving us Cena and Batista as seperate champions on two shows. If they merged and had them feud for awhile, it would be one less of them to deal with, and they might actually walk away with credibility.
I'm sorry but no credibility can come from a Cena/Batista feud on a merged show. 2 shows a week with them two as the focus? Meh.
addy2hotty is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®