Quote:
|
Originally Posted by thedamndest
Those are good points, and I doubt they would remerge anyway just because , but if they were going to, now would be the opportune time. The people they have gotten rid of probably would have been axed during a remerge (not that I agree with who was axed). The too many egos thing could actually have been a boon, not in the sense that ego is good, but in the 98-00 sense when there was a credible main event scene. And as for Batista feuding with Cena, it might work better than you would think. If Batista were given a program he actually cared about he might shake that rust that he's had ever since he got back. And Cena wouldn't have to continue with his Monster of the Month feuds. My reasoning is this: WWE is going to keep giving us Cena and Batista as seperate champions on two shows. If they merged and had them feud for awhile, it would be one less of them to deal with, and they might actually walk away with credibility.
|
I'm sorry but no credibility can come from a Cena/Batista feud on a merged show. 2 shows a week with them two as the focus? Meh.