For a WM Main Event, would you prefer...? (spoilers)

**Corkscrewed** · 01-29-2007, 01:17 AM

Taker won the Rumble. He can face either Batista or Cena.

It was reported months ago that Batista would be the one to end Taker's streak, but obviously, this would be idiotic for the guy Taker puts over to be a guy who might not even be wrestling in two or three years (due to age).

So it's obvious (though not necessarily good, depending on who you are). Have him face Cena. Lesser of two evils in my opinion, and if Taker is going to put someone over, it might as well be the guy he should have put over (but didn't) two or three years ago. Cena and Taker have history. Cena's the young star. Cena's probably staying in the WWE for a long time. Cena's badly booked, but at least he's a nice guy and cares about the business and doesn't have an ego.

So in the above choices (they're two, but I want to discern how many people are picking so-and-so because they want to versus because they have no better choice), would you prefer Taker vs Cena or Taker vs Batista?

View Poll Results: Which Wrestlemania 23 Main Event would you prefer?
Cena vs Undertaker	3	50.00%
Batista vs Undertaker	2	33.33%
I don't like it, but Cena vs Undertaker	0	0%
I don't like it, but Batista vs Undertaker	1	16.67%
Voters: 6. You must log in or register to vote on this poll.

01-29-2007, 01:17 AM	#1
Corkscrewed Posts: 18,357	For a WM Main Event, would you prefer...? (spoilers) Taker won the Rumble. He can face either Batista or Cena. It was reported months ago that Batista would be the one to end Taker's streak, but obviously, this would be idiotic for the guy Taker puts over to be a guy who might not even be wrestling in two or three years (due to age). So it's obvious (though not necessarily good, depending on who you are). Have him face Cena. Lesser of two evils in my opinion, and if Taker is going to put someone over, it might as well be the guy he should have put over (but didn't) two or three years ago. Cena and Taker have history. Cena's the young star. Cena's probably staying in the WWE for a long time. Cena's badly booked, but at least he's a nice guy and cares about the business and doesn't have an ego. So in the above choices (they're two, but I want to discern how many people are picking so-and-so because they want to versus because they have no better choice), would you prefer Taker vs Cena or Taker vs Batista?