Savage better than Flair?

**Marc the Smark** · 03-25-2007, 11:09 PM

Somebody wrote this in another wrestling forum...

"Randy Savage was overall a better preformer in the ring then Ric Flair. He was probably a better draw to. He had more charisma and showed more psychology. Ric Flair is great, I think the guy has tons of talent and I own his DVD. But the very fact that the WWE continues to ignore Savage and everything he did, while they continue to praise Flair as the legend of all legends makes me ill to my stomach. Ric Flair came out in November of 2001 on Raw, and you could almost hear a pin drop. Not only was his confidence then in the shitter, but the fans barely cared about him. Since HHH creamed his pants for the guy, the WWE has gone out of there way to put it in everyones heads, this past half-decade that Flair is the best wrestler of all time. What a joke.

Even if Savage and Vince are on bad terms, there's no reason to rewrite history, and give the audience false information about who the best ever were."

Agree or disagree?

03-25-2007, 11:09 PM	#1
Marc the Smark Posts: 2,064	Savage better than Flair? Somebody wrote this in another wrestling forum... "Randy Savage was overall a better preformer in the ring then Ric Flair. He was probably a better draw to. He had more charisma and showed more psychology. Ric Flair is great, I think the guy has tons of talent and I own his DVD. But the very fact that the WWE continues to ignore Savage and everything he did, while they continue to praise Flair as the legend of all legends makes me ill to my stomach. Ric Flair came out in November of 2001 on Raw, and you could almost hear a pin drop. Not only was his confidence then in the shitter, but the fans barely cared about him. Since HHH creamed his pants for the guy, the WWE has gone out of there way to put it in everyones heads, this past half-decade that Flair is the best wrestler of all time. What a joke. Even if Savage and Vince are on bad terms, there's no reason to rewrite history, and give the audience false information about who the best ever were." Agree or disagree?