![]() |
|
|
#36 |
|
Higher. Further. Faster.
Posts: 21,184
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It's not like Lesnar has set the world on fire anyway. He's got 5 years left on his contract so that's plenty of time to re-establish his character which for some reason people are afraid is looking weak. I have more fingers than he has jobs so it's not like his credibility's been shot to all hell. Lesnar can suck it for all I care cause he's just gotten tiring and boring really fast but this is reflective of Austin causing a ruckus back 2002. On the subject of the Undertaker feud, I like to think that the whole point of the return of the original character is a blow-off feud with Kane cause it, you know, makes sense. Outside of Kane, the mystique of the character at this point in time is kind of dwindled and stupid considering this era where characters like that are a thing of the past. If it were just for the WM match with Kane I'd have no problem with it but as it's looking, since it's in for the long haul, I see no point in the resurrection of the character. But have we forgotten that Taker still didn't sell for shit or job even as the biker character? I hardly see that big of a difference.
|
|
|
|