Should WWE depush or "demote" guys who fail Wellness?

**KingofOldSchool** · 05-20-2008, 02:06 PM

Okay, with the whole Regal thing and before that, Jeff Hardy, I brought up someplace else that first and second time offenders should be demoted. For instance...

Jeff Hardy got suspended right before Wrestlemania, when he came back a few weeks ago he should have showed up on Smackdown. Which is seen as a step down from Raw, so he is basically stuck on Smackdown until the company deems he deserves to be moved back to Raw.

And then let's say Finlay gets busted, he gets demoted to ECW. And then someone like Mike Knox gets busted and taken off the ECW roster and is moved to FCW.

I got to thinking this because me and someone else was getting into an argument over Jeff Hardy and his push. I feel he should be stuck facing Charlie Haas and Snitsky every week for the next few months, while the other guy insists he should be put back into the position he was at before he got suspended. Since in his eyes it would be stupid not to push someone as over as Hardy is regardless if he's been busted twice in the last 6 months. And that it only says the wrestler will be suspended for 30 or 60 days and not 30 or 60 days plus loss of push.

So what do you think? Should Wellness violators be depush/demoted or should they be allowed to retain the push they had before the suspension?

View Poll Results: So?
They should retain their push	2	11.11%
Only depush them if it's their second violation	9	50.00%
Yes, they get off to easily	2	11.11%
Depends how over they are	3	16.67%
They should be fired after their first violation	2	11.11%
Voters: 18. You must log in or register to vote on this poll.

05-20-2008, 02:06 PM	#1
KingofOldSchool ...IN HD!!!! Posts: 23,327	Should WWE depush or "demote" guys who fail Wellness? Okay, with the whole Regal thing and before that, Jeff Hardy, I brought up someplace else that first and second time offenders should be demoted. For instance... Jeff Hardy got suspended right before Wrestlemania, when he came back a few weeks ago he should have showed up on Smackdown. Which is seen as a step down from Raw, so he is basically stuck on Smackdown until the company deems he deserves to be moved back to Raw. And then let's say Finlay gets busted, he gets demoted to ECW. And then someone like Mike Knox gets busted and taken off the ECW roster and is moved to FCW. I got to thinking this because me and someone else was getting into an argument over Jeff Hardy and his push. I feel he should be stuck facing Charlie Haas and Snitsky every week for the next few months, while the other guy insists he should be put back into the position he was at before he got suspended. Since in his eyes it would be stupid not to push someone as over as Hardy is regardless if he's been busted twice in the last 6 months. And that it only says the wrestler will be suspended for 30 or 60 days and not 30 or 60 days plus loss of push. So what do you think? Should Wellness violators be depush/demoted or should they be allowed to retain the push they had before the suspension? Sign up for Goozex to trade in your old games for new ones. (Click banner) http://www.yourfree360games.com/index.php?ref=232348 Sign up under me and receive FREE X-Box 360 games. You can get Guitar Hero: World Tour Guitar Bundle, Gears of War 2, Fallout 3, Fable II, and MORE! Very easy to do, PM me for added info.