So what would you rather do- Bring back the Hardcore title or up the IC title?

[FourFifty]

So what would you rather do- Bring back the Hardcore title or up the value of the IC title?

With the Hardcore title you'll have some people bitch about how there's another title. However, the Hardcore title isn't a dime a dozen gold strap that's used as a place holder. It has a style of its own that all but promises some great, brutal spots. It's also great for some comedy spots.
This kind of title can open the show with a championship match (IE- Crash Holly), put a title fued in the midcard where the belt means something (more on that later), and with the right wrestlers you can even put it in the main event (like Edge vs Foley, or any TLC match).
It'll help get wrestlers from all three brands over with the 24/7 rule, and it could help bring in a fresh faces. "Bah Gawd! That's Ron Killings! He just won the Hardcore title, and he's not a WWE superstar!"
The Hardcore title is one of my favorite titles of all time. There were some great matches, wonderful skits, and fond memories.


....However, the IC title has been around for a while, and used to be a huge draw. Great champions have used the IC title as a stepping stone. HHH, HBK, Bret Hart, Steve Austin, The Rock, and more. Now the IC title is just a midcard title that people forget about. You won't see the WWE champion or the World Heavyweight Champion cut a promo without the title. Jericho has come out many times since getting the title without his title, as if to say "Well who cares about the IC title anymore?"
The IC title should have more value to it. Come on, it hasn't been on the line at WrestleMania for how many years?


So one or the other- Bring back the Hardcore title or bring value to the IC title?