Has the Triple Crown (WWE) lost meaning?

**Xero** · 01-20-2009, 07:34 PM

I also just saw a Morales match where they mentioned the fact he was the first to hold all three titles.

I guess this comes down to whether they actually need to use the term "Triple Crown", because with that and Carl's post the idea of the triple crown was pushed. And let's face it, that's just splitting hairs.

So deal with it Destor, the Triple Crown exists, or at least did, in kayfabe and thus brings it back up to where the Grand Slam was.

Though this is all moot now, since it means even less than it did when the Grand Slam or Triple Crown were the only deal in town.

01-20-2009, 07:34 PM	#34
Xero He's Here Posts: 60,735	I also just saw a Morales match where they mentioned the fact he was the first to hold all three titles. I guess this comes down to whether they actually need to use the term "Triple Crown", because with that and Carl's post the idea of the triple crown was pushed. And let's face it, that's just splitting hairs. So deal with it Destor, the Triple Crown exists, or at least did, in kayfabe and thus brings it back up to where the Grand Slam was. Though this is all moot now, since it means even less than it did when the Grand Slam or Triple Crown were the only deal in town. Last edited by Xero; 01-20-2009 at 07:39 PM.