Quantity v. Quality?

**SIDRA** · 03-10-2009, 09:58 PM

Her's an interesting point. Do you think the number of times someone has been champion is more important or how long you are the champion? Example:

====================================

Bruno Sammartino held the WWE (At that time WWF.) title twice for a total of 4,040 days. His first reign lasted 8 years.

Triple H has held the WWE title 8 times for 493 days total. Roughly a year and a half.

====================================

So Triple H has won it more, but Bruno held it without loosing longer.

I'm going with length of the title reign. It's more impressive to me to hold a title once or twice and be able to defend it for a long time. Than to win and loose it over and over.

Whats more important/impressive to you? Discussion open.

03-10-2009, 09:58 PM	#1
SIDRA Junior Member Posts: 65	Quantity v. Quality? Her's an interesting point. Do you think the number of times someone has been champion is more important or how long you are the champion? Example: ==================================== Bruno Sammartino held the WWE (At that time WWF.) title twice for a total of 4,040 days. His first reign lasted 8 years. Triple H has held the WWE title 8 times for 493 days total. Roughly a year and a half. ==================================== So Triple H has won it more, but Bruno held it without loosing longer. I'm going with length of the title reign. It's more impressive to me to hold a title once or twice and be able to defend it for a long time. Than to win and loose it over and over. Whats more important/impressive to you? Discussion open. Last edited by SIDRA; 03-10-2009 at 10:01 PM.