My Thoughts on RVD, Jeff Hardy and AJ Styles

**The Show Off** · 04-20-2010, 04:46 PM

Last night was a great night for TNA. They had three three quality matches and a nice title change.

People will bitch about everything, as is evidence by the above thread. Rob Van Dam in a quality compitent wrestler that went over a cowardly heel to with the richest prize in TNA.

AJ's reign may be "weak" but it was "weak" in the way the JBL's title reign was "weak." He played the cowardly heel to the best of his ability and tried his best to make you want him to lose. Just because a champion is "weak" doesn't mean he's bad. Besides AJ's credibility was well established earlier on in his reign by going over Sting, Samoa Joe, Christopher Daniels, and Kurt Angle clean. Then he turned heel and he relied on Ric Flair's help too much, Tenay and Taz talked about that during his defense against The Pope.

TNA has sooo many problems, why can they be given credit where credit is due?

04-20-2010, 04:46 PM	#20
The Show Off Total Non-Stop Apologist Posts: 4,430	Last night was a great night for TNA. They had three three quality matches and a nice title change. People will bitch about everything, as is evidence by the above thread. Rob Van Dam in a quality compitent wrestler that went over a cowardly heel to with the richest prize in TNA. AJ's reign may be "weak" but it was "weak" in the way the JBL's title reign was "weak." He played the cowardly heel to the best of his ability and tried his best to make you want him to lose. Just because a champion is "weak" doesn't mean he's bad. Besides AJ's credibility was well established earlier on in his reign by going over Sting, Samoa Joe, Christopher Daniels, and Kurt Angle clean. Then he turned heel and he relied on Ric Flair's help too much, Tenay and Taz talked about that during his defense against The Pope. TNA has sooo many problems, why can they be given credit where credit is due?