I miss titles changing hands on weekly episodic television shows

**Mooияakeя�** · 07-16-2010, 06:49 PM

Looking back at the WWE title...

If you don't count them taking it off RVD on the July 3, 2006 of RAW (which they probably did cos he was "ECW" and won it in such fashion) and the two vacations of the title and thus needing a new champ...

You have to go back to September 16, 2003 to the title has changed hands on RAW or SD! (back when there was no brand split / belt was on SD!)

I just think this takes away the unpredictability. I think they do it cos of the PPV money, but if the unpredictability is there, people will tune in anyway if the card is good enough cos they will still be none the wiser. So it sorta evens itself out.

Anyway, is it good for the title to change hands on the weekly shows just as much as it is to change hands on PPV's only? Discuss.

07-16-2010, 06:49 PM	#1
Mooияakeя� ▒▓▀▄WINNER▄▀▓▒ Posts: 5,070	I miss titles changing hands on weekly episodic television shows Looking back at the WWE title... If you don't count them taking it off RVD on the July 3, 2006 of RAW (which they probably did cos he was "ECW" and won it in such fashion) and the two vacations of the title and thus needing a new champ... You have to go back to September 16, 2003 to the title has changed hands on RAW or SD! (back when there was no brand split / belt was on SD!) I just think this takes away the unpredictability. I think they do it cos of the PPV money, but if the unpredictability is there, people will tune in anyway if the card is good enough cos they will still be none the wiser. So it sorta evens itself out. Anyway, is it good for the title to change hands on the weekly shows just as much as it is to change hands on PPV's only? Discuss.