TPWW Forums  

Go Back   TPWW Forums > w r e s t l i n g > wrestling forum

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-16-2010, 07:41 PM   #1
Fox
"Ask him!"
 
Fox's Avatar
 
Posts: 10,075
Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)
Does Goldberg Belong in the WWE Hall-of-Fame?

Triple H apparently doesn't think so:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Credit: Rajah.com
WWE superstar Triple H was recently interviewed by SBNation Atlanta while in town to hype WrestleMania 27 tickets going on sale last week.

During the interview, Triple H took a few shots at former WCW and WWE star Bill Goldberg. When asked about his favorite opponents, Triple H responded:

"For me, from my singles career, would probably be Rock and obviously Shawn. Between there I had a lot of hodge-podge guys, which weren't really what you'd call classics. The Goldbergs and guys like that."

Goldberg is a former Atlanta Falcons NFL player and made his name in the Atlanta-based WCW promotion. When asked wether Bill Goldberg deserved to be inducted into WWE's Hall of Fame in Atlanta during WrestleMania 27 weekend, Triple H responded with:

"Bill's trying to get into the Hall of Fame. If there's a rumor about him coming back, he probably started it. I've not seen any mention of his name."

Goldberg has now responded to Triple H's comments, writing on Twitter:

"I read HHH and HBK’s views on the #WWE HOF….everyone is entitled to their own opinion.They do have a point if induction is based on tenure"

Interesting.

While the point of not having enough tenure in the WWE is a good one, it is easily reneged by the fact that A: Pete Rose is in the fucking WWE HOF and he was NEVER an active wrestler, and B: Goldberg is a former World Heavyweight Champion in the WWE, has a big (if not bad) WrestleMania match on his resume, and his run in WCW is not only historic, but both a huge part of what drove WCW to defeat the WWF for so long, and a huge part of why the company fell apart (by that I mean killing him off with the Starrcade/Fingerpoint of Doom situation).

What do you all think?


Fox is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®