What else can be done with MITB

**Rock Bottom** · 10-12-2011, 06:38 AM

I was just randomly wondering about it, even though there's plenty going on for this year and early next year. Besides a MITB winner cashing in on the other MITB winner that just cashed in, I can't think of much else to be done with this in the near future if the roster remains as it is.

Getting old? Or is it just a different dose of the Royal Rumble as far as pushes go? With the main titles defended and changing hands as often as they are, do you think the Rumble is just a relic of a procedure right now, barring the entertainment of the battle royal itself.

SPOILER: show

I have to say, of all the MITB winners, they've been elevated to another level. I'm not sure how this is going to play out with Daniel Bryan. I'm also not sure who else is going to benefit much from a MITB. I could go for an R-Truth win, but not sure who else.

On the same token, in order for MITB to continue to be taken seriously, it would stand to reason that at least most of the guys be deserving of a main event push, and that it at least remains close to a 100% title win rate.

Should there be only one, or two? Unless they end the brand split, doesn't the SmackDown MITB winner just seem second fiddle like most other things on SmackDown?

Has MITB seen its best days, or does the WWE still have enough up and coming talent to sustain its credibility? Or do you think this just ties in to the nature in which the titles are presented now?

10-12-2011, 06:38 AM	#1
Rock Bottom Ball So Hard University Posts: 8,450	What else can be done with MITB I was just randomly wondering about it, even though there's plenty going on for this year and early next year. Besides a MITB winner cashing in on the other MITB winner that just cashed in, I can't think of much else to be done with this in the near future if the roster remains as it is. Getting old? Or is it just a different dose of the Royal Rumble as far as pushes go? With the main titles defended and changing hands as often as they are, do you think the Rumble is just a relic of a procedure right now, barring the entertainment of the battle royal itself. SPOILER: show They just did a 41-man battle royal on SmackDown. I have to say, of all the MITB winners, they've been elevated to another level. I'm not sure how this is going to play out with Daniel Bryan. I'm also not sure who else is going to benefit much from a MITB. I could go for an R-Truth win, but not sure who else. On the same token, in order for MITB to continue to be taken seriously, it would stand to reason that at least most of the guys be deserving of a main event push, and that it at least remains close to a 100% title win rate. Should there be only one, or two? Unless they end the brand split, doesn't the SmackDown MITB winner just seem second fiddle like most other things on SmackDown? Has MITB seen its best days, or does the WWE still have enough up and coming talent to sustain its credibility? Or do you think this just ties in to the nature in which the titles are presented now?