Lets talk about WWE making decisions based upon ratings, Merry Christmas TPWW

[Taker it Easy]

Ok. So speculations exist that WWE will be talking the belt off of Punk due to low ratings during his segments. Are they really that starved for an extra dollar?

Well, I do not like WWE basing what seems like a majority of their decisions, long terms or short, upon ratings. I think this may have been discussed previously but hell, lets do it again.

I understand they want to follow where the money is but it really seems similar to a steroid analogy. It gives them a short term performance boost yet in the long run it is not healthy.

Sometimes I don't see how they expect their champions to 'get over' into the area that they want them to be in if they keep removing the belt after a few weeks. We need long term champions.

We need growing franchises that have the companies support. WWE seems afraid to put more than one egg in their basket. They no longer seem to let the wrestlers work and rather seem to bypass the wrestler and become the wrestler their self. It seems if there can be nobody to out grow WWE's shadow.

There is a lot of confusion out there as to who the champion of the company is. We all know Cena is their whore horse but he also is not their Steve Austin and there seems to be no indication at the moment that he is heading into that direction.

Love him or hate him, I want a long term champion. Months to a year. Give Punk the belt for a year or more, please.

You may remove the belt from your, arguably, most charismatic, most talented in ring worker and most talented superstar on the mic because of the numbers during his moments. C'mon. We all know how Viet-fucking-nam turned out and it was booked by the fucking numbers. Get with it WWE. It is about irrational feelings and intuitions not a freudian rational numbers approach.

Merry Christmas and Taker it Easy