![]() |
![]() |
#1 | |
Amazon Affiliate
Posts: 42,694
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Defying Booking Logic
There are formulas in professional wrestling. Good guys VS. Bad guys. Tweeners vs. Everyone etc.
With such a strange and evolving WWE audience, however, I wonder how much of the old way of doing things is relevant now. Could a heel stable go to war with another heel stable and fans still care or tune in? Would the fans just shit on both teams or would the reaction be mixed with some fans rooting for one team over the other? How often has this been done in the past with heels feuding with other heels? For the wrestling historians (Noid) I'd also like to ask if giving Giant the title in 95' was well-received by the fans considering it went against a lot of established booking logic (an almost complete unknown wins the top title in his first match). Was this the exception to the rule? Would this work today? (Does TNA count?) It's time to make TPWW MEAT again! Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |