Should the Undertaker wrestle one more match at WM31?

**slik** · 07-27-2014, 04:53 PM

People seem real big on Taker and Sting having a match.

I think I've mentioned on here before I think Taker vs Sting as they are today would be a TERRIBLE match (hence the birth of Surfer Sting vs Biker Taker only).

Every time Sting hits the Scorpion Death Lock now it looks a dude who is constipated and afraid to sit on a toilet and Taker can't go quite like he used to (though he is a better wrestler than Sting and always has been). If they did wrestle it would be twenty minutes of entrances (for each of them) followed by a very slowly paced 15 minute match full of them gingerly hitting their spots on one another.

And then Taker would win.

So what do you think, should the Undertaker wrestle one more time at Mania or just stay retired?

View Poll Results: Should the Undertaker wrestle again at WM31?
Yes	10	31.25%
No	28	87.50%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 32. You must log in or register to vote on this poll.

07-27-2014, 04:53 PM	#1
slik Trickster Demon Posts: 59,823	Should the Undertaker wrestle one more match at WM31? People seem real big on Taker and Sting having a match. I think I've mentioned on here before I think Taker vs Sting as they are today would be a TERRIBLE match (hence the birth of Surfer Sting vs Biker Taker only). Every time Sting hits the Scorpion Death Lock now it looks a dude who is constipated and afraid to sit on a toilet and Taker can't go quite like he used to (though he is a better wrestler than Sting and always has been). If they did wrestle it would be twenty minutes of entrances (for each of them) followed by a very slowly paced 15 minute match full of them gingerly hitting their spots on one another. And then Taker would win. So what do you think, should the Undertaker wrestle one more time at Mania or just stay retired?