Is WWE being cheap, stupid or both? (RAW Spoilers)

**dablackguy** · 10-07-2014, 06:58 PM

Make no mistake, I don't have a problem with how HITC is booked. Of course, I'm really hoping for another Ambrose and Rollins match (this time in the cell) but with the way the Cena/Lesnar at night of champions finished, the logical next step was to have them go at HITC in the cell.

Cena/Lesnar and Rollins/Ambrose both HITC seems like a much stronger card to me. Though, that would probably have to be the end for the Rollins/Ambrose feud.

The common belief is that Brock demands some absurd amount of money per appearance. You get the sense that that played into this. Seems entirely logical to continue to build Brock as an unstoppable monster and have him tear Cena apart in the cell.

Yet, that's not what we're getting. Interestingly, I think the network plays a bit of a part in this. Since you're not pushing for buys anymore, why shell out the money for Brock when there's probably no return on it. Despite it probably being best for business.

So I return you to the original question. Stupid? Cheap? Both?

10-07-2014, 06:58 PM	#1
dablackguy Tacos! Posts: 795	Is WWE being cheap, stupid or both? (RAW Spoilers) Make no mistake, I don't have a problem with how HITC is booked. Of course, I'm really hoping for another Ambrose and Rollins match (this time in the cell) but with the way the Cena/Lesnar at night of champions finished, the logical next step was to have them go at HITC in the cell. Cena/Lesnar and Rollins/Ambrose both HITC seems like a much stronger card to me. Though, that would probably have to be the end for the Rollins/Ambrose feud. The common belief is that Brock demands some absurd amount of money per appearance. You get the sense that that played into this. Seems entirely logical to continue to build Brock as an unstoppable monster and have him tear Cena apart in the cell. Yet, that's not what we're getting. Interestingly, I think the network plays a bit of a part in this. Since you're not pushing for buys anymore, why shell out the money for Brock when there's probably no return on it. Despite it probably being best for business. So I return you to the original question. Stupid? Cheap? Both? The question isn't: Who's Next? Who's First? Who's There? It isn't even Who's Left? The question is, who gives a shit?