Is WWE being cheap, stupid or both? (RAW Spoilers)

**Damian Rey** · 10-07-2014, 07:23 PM

I think having Brock only wrestle on ppv is brilliant. It creates a legitimate draw and reason to watch the ppv. With that said, if the idea was to eventually put the title on Brock, they should have restructured his deal. Not having the belt, or the champ, on a HITC ppv is absurd. Hell, they could have made it a fatal four way match, giving everyone the chance to get their hands on Rollins. Then have Cena get pinned and further that story. It mashes no sense Brock wouldn't want to destroy Rollins as well.

10-07-2014, 07:23 PM	#2
Damian Rey Posts: 3,755	I think having Brock only wrestle on ppv is brilliant. It creates a legitimate draw and reason to watch the ppv. With that said, if the idea was to eventually put the title on Brock, they should have restructured his deal. Not having the belt, or the champ, on a HITC ppv is absurd. Hell, they could have made it a fatal four way match, giving everyone the chance to get their hands on Rollins. Then have Cena get pinned and further that story. It mashes no sense Brock wouldn't want to destroy Rollins as well.