What was worst: The way WWE booked the WCW invasion or the way WCW booked Bret Hart?

**NoyaPerez20** · 01-04-2015, 03:05 PM

What in your opinion was more terrible between the two?

In my opinion the way WCW booked Bret Hart was far more terrible, than the way the invasion angle as booked. Sure, we didn't have Goldberg and Sting and all this guys that made WCW popular, but they evantually arrived (although Sting was late in almost 10 years). Booker T was a tremendous wrestler on Raw and SmackDown and was a World Heavyweight Champion. Goldberg also won the World Championship in the WWE. Ric Flair was treated great and was a intercontinental champion and a tag team champion in the WWE. None of those guys were treated as horribly as everyone seems to think.

Bret Hart on the other hand was getting buried, and was basically a mid-card type of guy. And even during the time he was the WCW Champion, he was put into this horrible nWo 2000 stable, that was just a rehash, of a rehashed nWo. Plus Kevin Nash and Scott Hall didn't give a f*ck at that point, which basically made this stable look even dumber. Bret Hart than suffered a stroke, because they put him in a match with a terrible wrestler named Goldberg. And basically all we had was Bret Hart in the mid-card, with no real storylines, with no real matches (his match were just like every WCW match: 'can we add some more run-ins and DQ finishes, please?'), and was just completely wasted.

01-04-2015, 03:05 PM	#1
NoyaPerez20 Posts: 91	What was worst: The way WWE booked the WCW invasion or the way WCW booked Bret Hart? What in your opinion was more terrible between the two? In my opinion the way WCW booked Bret Hart was far more terrible, than the way the invasion angle as booked. Sure, we didn't have Goldberg and Sting and all this guys that made WCW popular, but they evantually arrived (although Sting was late in almost 10 years). Booker T was a tremendous wrestler on Raw and SmackDown and was a World Heavyweight Champion. Goldberg also won the World Championship in the WWE. Ric Flair was treated great and was a intercontinental champion and a tag team champion in the WWE. None of those guys were treated as horribly as everyone seems to think. Bret Hart on the other hand was getting buried, and was basically a mid-card type of guy. And even during the time he was the WCW Champion, he was put into this horrible nWo 2000 stable, that was just a rehash, of a rehashed nWo. Plus Kevin Nash and Scott Hall didn't give a f*ck at that point, which basically made this stable look even dumber. Bret Hart than suffered a stroke, because they put him in a match with a terrible wrestler named Goldberg. And basically all we had was Bret Hart in the mid-card, with no real storylines, with no real matches (his match were just like every WCW match: 'can we add some more run-ins and DQ finishes, please?'), and was just completely wasted. Don't judge me for loving wrestling cause I'm a girl. Girls love fights to, y'know!