Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AlphaBean
I know we've been getting along, but you're an idiot.
The Vikings had no shot as they were. The attitudes... Smith didn't care about football, Moss was immature and Carter was JUST AS immature, hindering Moss' potential.
Now we have the most dominant offense in the NFL, and the only thing holding us back is coaching.
Free agents my ass. We have the talent. Our offense is almost perfect. Our defense only has a hole at linebacker, and even that remains to be seen. Nattiel showed a lot of potential last season, and he's had a year to grow.
I don't think we're a player away. I think the talent we have should be able to mask the talent we lack. But that again is all on Mike Tice.
The Vikings could win it all, if Mike Tice learned from his mistakes. He brags about never making the same mistakes twice...
We'll see.
But don't say our 98 team was better. Our COACHES were.  |
Talent wise you we're... most dominent offense in the nfl? I can't tell, but you must still be joking...
By the way, I was more refering to 2000, when you had Culpepper and didn't have Reed (I think he was in New Orleans that year).
Time will tell.... I'm just really not sold on your RB situation, and if you ran a short route/ball control, might be a different story, but the office Tice is running is a "high scoring" and for that you need a good RB, who can bail your ass out when it's 3rd and 17.
I'm not saying the Vikes are the worst or have no shot.. but assuming every team is healthy... I just don't see them even making the superbowl.
07-31-2004, 07:16 AM
Threaded Mode