![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
CodeBot Engaged...WOAAHH!
Posts: 9,815
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Shakeups and Dual Branded PPVs
I don't understand the point of both. Without brand exclusive PPVs there is not enough PPV time to develop new feuds to put on PPV.
It can't be a coincidence that both Raw and Smackdown ratings are already way down, and it's only been 2 weeks since the Shakeup. Without brand exclusive PPVs there is no reason to have separate rosters and separate championships. This is the same exact thing they did last time. Make separate rosters with their own titles, then get rid of brand exclusive PPVS, next they will be doing Raw Supershows where everybody is on Raw, then they will Unify titles, then it will get really stale, then they will come up with the great idea of a brand split... It got to the point that before this last brand split, there was no reason to even watch Smackdown. It was just Raw recap and Midcard stories that don't matter since they don't get on PPV anyways, ala a longer version of Superstars. How long until Vince decides (again) that if everybody is on all the PPVs then everybody should be on Raw? This is especially comical then when they still keep doing the Survivor Series, Batteground, or whatever PPV that is Raw vs Smackdown long after there is any distinction between the 2 brands lol. |
|
|
|