PART 1 - Do you agree or disagree with the following paragraphs?

**Heyman** · 11-23-2004, 03:50 PM

PART 1 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?

1) The "novelty" of going 'over' Kurt Angle is no longer existent. In other words, it's not really that big of a deal anymore if a wrestler defeats Kurt Angle (unless it's a convincing squash.....which will never happen) since Angle has jobbed quite a few times in the past (i.e. Guerrero, Lesnar, Big Show, Edge, etc.). In other words - if John Cena were to defeat Kurt Angle at Wrestlemania, would it REALLY help give Cena THAT much more credibility?.

2) The ONLY guy on Smackdown right now who, in theory, can ELEVATE an upper-card wrestler into a CREDIBLE main-event champion, is the Undertaker. Undertaker is the ONLY guy on Smackdown right now, who hasn't jobbed a whole lot in the past. The only guys to go over Taker CLEANLY in the last 5-6 years or so (if memory serves me correctly), is LESNAR and AUSTIN. Therefore - a novelty still exists in someone "cleanly" defeating the Undertaker.

3) Triple H has played a TREMENDOUS role on Raw in creating "credible" superstars. He has been a more POSTIVE influence for Raw than NEGATIVE.

-Triple H helped Benoit gained credibility. Because of Triple H's job(s) to Benoit, anyone who can defeat Benoit now (like Edge for instance?) will gain credibility.

-Triple H helped establish Benjamin as a major player.

-Orton's association with Triple H helped give him credibility

-Batista's association with Triple H has helped given him credibility.

Triple H is still GREAT for Raw, because his JOBS (when he does them on the rare occassion) MEANS something. Furthermore - Triple H has been built up SO MUCH, that even a guy 'getting the better of him' (i.e. Benjamin) in a certain situation has HUGE meaning.

If Triple H were to JOB as much as people (on here) wanted him to, then the novelty of someone defeating Triple H would be non-existent.......as we are now seeing with Kurt Angle on Smackdown.......which is perhaps one reason why Smackdown is having a tough time in creating CREDIBLE main-event superstars.

11-23-2004, 03:50 PM	#1
Heyman Father of Hinduship Posts: 21,083	PART 1 - Do you agree or disagree with the following paragraphs? PART 1 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? 1) The "novelty" of going 'over' Kurt Angle is no longer existent. In other words, it's not really that big of a deal anymore if a wrestler defeats Kurt Angle (unless it's a convincing squash.....which will never happen) since Angle has jobbed quite a few times in the past (i.e. Guerrero, Lesnar, Big Show, Edge, etc.). In other words - if John Cena were to defeat Kurt Angle at Wrestlemania, would it REALLY help give Cena THAT much more credibility?. 2) The ONLY guy on Smackdown right now who, in theory, can ELEVATE an upper-card wrestler into a CREDIBLE main-event champion, is the Undertaker. Undertaker is the ONLY guy on Smackdown right now, who hasn't jobbed a whole lot in the past. The only guys to go over Taker CLEANLY in the last 5-6 years or so (if memory serves me correctly), is LESNAR and AUSTIN. Therefore - a novelty still exists in someone "cleanly" defeating the Undertaker. 3) Triple H has played a TREMENDOUS role on Raw in creating "credible" superstars. He has been a more POSTIVE influence for Raw than NEGATIVE. -Triple H helped Benoit gained credibility. Because of Triple H's job(s) to Benoit, anyone who can defeat Benoit now (like Edge for instance?) will gain credibility. -Triple H helped establish Benjamin as a major player. -Orton's association with Triple H helped give him credibility -Batista's association with Triple H has helped given him credibility. Triple H is still GREAT for Raw, because his JOBS (when he does them on the rare occassion) MEANS something. Furthermore - Triple H has been built up SO MUCH, that even a guy 'getting the better of him' (i.e. Benjamin) in a certain situation has HUGE meaning. If Triple H were to JOB as much as people (on here) wanted him to, then the novelty of someone defeating Triple H would be non-existent.......as we are now seeing with Kurt Angle on Smackdown.......which is perhaps one reason why Smackdown is having a tough time in creating CREDIBLE main-event superstars.