DISCUSSION - Do you agree with the WWE's handling of the "Brock Lesnar" situation?

**Heyman** · 12-20-2004, 11:28 PM

DISCUSSION - Do you agree with the WWE's handling of the "Brock Lesnar" situation?

It is now well known that Brock Lesnar HAS expressed interest in returning to the WWE.

It is also well known that the WWE aren't exactly "rushing out" to bring in Lesnar.....and actually feel somewhat hesistant in bringing him in. They feel that Lesnar "walked out" on them.

What would you do if you were Vince McMahon?

A) Bring him back with Open Arms (and have him once again be a main-eventer).

B) Bring him back, but have him JOB.....and basically put him down to mid-card status as punishment (and have him main-event at a later date maybe).

C) Don't bring back Brock Lesnar

Here's the way I see it right now:

-Credit goes to Brock Lesnar for realizing that he wasn't passionate about the WWE (at the time), and wanted to give football a shot. Unlike guys like Goldberg for instance (i.e. guys who have limited passion for the business, and yet continue to stick around and hold others down).......Lesnar spoke from the heart.

-It's the WWE's fault for not adequately replacing the loss of Lesnar (i.e. perhaps doing a better job with the lottery draft).

-It's the Smackdown creative teams' fault for not creating new and intriguing characters to REPLACE Lesnar. Why wasn't RVD pushed as a main-eventer? Why did Smackdown seemingly "give up" on Guerrero? (I know personal problems with Guerrero's life had something to do with it, but still). Why has JBL *still* not scored a clean pinfall victory?

-It's not Brock Lesnar's fault that Smackdown went down in quality. It's the WWE's fault.

-Life is unfair. Wrestlers have no right to complain if Brock Lesnar is brought back and "steals their spot". If they're angry over it? Cry, or get the fuck out.

-Lesnar is one of the *FEW* guys left in the wrestling world that can still potentially draw. Lesnar was already a main-eventer.....and has that "aura of dominance" due to him being pushed so fast (guys like Goldberg, Triple H, Austin, The Rock, and Undertaker are probably the only other guys that have this "aura").

CONCLUSION: The WWE should bring back Brock Lesnar, and stick him in the main-events IMMEDIATELY. Try and bring him in as a FACE. Turn him heel obviously, if the fans turn on him.

I'd even go as far as saying, that Brock Lesnar (biggest face?......if they capitalize on his return face pop) should go up against Triple H (biggest heel) at Wrestlemania.

If other wrestlers resent the fact that Lesnar gets the main-event? Tough shit. Lesnar is perhaps the ONE guy that can draw if pushed right (upon returning).

That's just my opinion.

12-20-2004, 11:28 PM	#1
Heyman Father of Hinduship Posts: 21,083	DISCUSSION - Do you agree with the WWE's handling of the "Brock Lesnar" situation? DISCUSSION - Do you agree with the WWE's handling of the "Brock Lesnar" situation? It is now well known that Brock Lesnar HAS expressed interest in returning to the WWE. It is also well known that the WWE aren't exactly "rushing out" to bring in Lesnar.....and actually feel somewhat hesistant in bringing him in. They feel that Lesnar "walked out" on them. What would you do if you were Vince McMahon? A) Bring him back with Open Arms (and have him once again be a main-eventer). B) Bring him back, but have him JOB.....and basically put him down to mid-card status as punishment (and have him main-event at a later date maybe). C) Don't bring back Brock Lesnar Here's the way I see it right now: -Credit goes to Brock Lesnar for realizing that he wasn't passionate about the WWE (at the time), and wanted to give football a shot. Unlike guys like Goldberg for instance (i.e. guys who have limited passion for the business, and yet continue to stick around and hold others down).......Lesnar spoke from the heart. -It's the WWE's fault for not adequately replacing the loss of Lesnar (i.e. perhaps doing a better job with the lottery draft). -It's the Smackdown creative teams' fault for not creating new and intriguing characters to REPLACE Lesnar. Why wasn't RVD pushed as a main-eventer? Why did Smackdown seemingly "give up" on Guerrero? (I know personal problems with Guerrero's life had something to do with it, but still). Why has JBL still not scored a clean pinfall victory? -It's not Brock Lesnar's fault that Smackdown went down in quality. It's the WWE's fault. -Life is unfair. Wrestlers have no right to complain if Brock Lesnar is brought back and "steals their spot". If they're angry over it? Cry, or get the fuck out. -Lesnar is one of the FEW guys left in the wrestling world that can still potentially draw. Lesnar was already a main-eventer.....and has that "aura of dominance" due to him being pushed so fast (guys like Goldberg, Triple H, Austin, The Rock, and Undertaker are probably the only other guys that have this "aura"). CONCLUSION: The WWE should bring back Brock Lesnar, and stick him in the main-events IMMEDIATELY. Try and bring him in as a FACE. Turn him heel obviously, if the fans turn on him. I'd even go as far as saying, that Brock Lesnar (biggest face?......if they capitalize on his return face pop) should go up against Triple H (biggest heel) at Wrestlemania. If other wrestlers resent the fact that Lesnar gets the main-event? Tough shit. Lesnar is perhaps the ONE guy that can draw if pushed right (upon returning). That's just my opinion.