Would holding more co-brand house shows help the WWE?

**Pegasus Crawford** · 02-03-2005, 04:44 AM

After attending the WWE Supershow in Honolulu last night, I noticed that the attendance (while not a sellout when there was a house show with The Rock here) was much better then when the Raw brand alone came down here back in 2003.

So it got me thinking: What if the WWE held more co-brand house shows during the year? I'm not talking about every week, but like once a month or every two months, where there would be both brands wrestling at a house show and maybe an interpromotional match or two. Of course this is far from a re-merging of brands. Seeing as the separate brands only wrestle under one roof during the big PPVs and only seeing guys from both brands wrestle each other only at RR and WM, it would be a nice treat for the fans.

But of course, the flip side is that alot of fans who would feel alienated if a house show in their town was just a Raw or Smackdown show. What do you think?

02-03-2005, 04:44 AM	#1
Pegasus Crawford Damn me and my charisma Posts: 1,273	Would holding more co-brand house shows help the WWE? After attending the WWE Supershow in Honolulu last night, I noticed that the attendance (while not a sellout when there was a house show with The Rock here) was much better then when the Raw brand alone came down here back in 2003. So it got me thinking: What if the WWE held more co-brand house shows during the year? I'm not talking about every week, but like once a month or every two months, where there would be both brands wrestling at a house show and maybe an interpromotional match or two. Of course this is far from a re-merging of brands. Seeing as the separate brands only wrestle under one roof during the big PPVs and only seeing guys from both brands wrestle each other only at RR and WM, it would be a nice treat for the fans. But of course, the flip side is that alot of fans who would feel alienated if a house show in their town was just a Raw or Smackdown show. What do you think?