![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
LIMITLESS
Posts: 32,276
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yet another idea for how to "fix" the WWE...
And I'm not going to say integrate the rosters, or flip flop the titles between shows or...whatever else.
Anyways, what they should do is DROP SOME OF THE GODDAMN PPVs! They have what, like 14 a year? That's WAY too many. 1) There's hardly any build up. I mean, 4 weeks isn't a lot to credibly build up a half decent feud. 2) PPV quality isnt that good as it is! 3) PPVs are too damn expensive. I'm a long time fan, and I STILL don't wanna shell out 30 bucks a month. 4) PPVs should be special. Now, it's just like "eh..." So here's what I say they do... SCRAP EVERY PPV except the Big 5! Royal Rumble - January Wrestlemania - March King of the Ring - June Summerslam - August Survivor Series - November Hell, they could add one more and make it a nice even 6. Throw it in there for late September/ Early October (because of the longer interval between SummerSlam and Survivor Series) call it Fall Brawl, and it'd be fine. Of course, that would mean both brands are back under one roof, but that cuts costs too. Save Vince a little dinero. AND you could get a few interbrand feuds going that way. This way, they have some time to actually BUILD credible stories, it's not just like a one off thing. I (personally) would be more willing to throw our $30 6 times a year for a longer (and hopefully better as a consequence) built stories, as opposed to $30 13 times and $50 once (Wrestlemania) for the shit we get now. What do you guys think? "My belly's just a little big, my heinie's just a little big, but bruddah, I'm bad and they know I'm bad." - Dusty Rhodes
|
|
|
|