Lesnar's Had the Title for quite a while

**Corkscrewed** · 01-29-2004, 05:12 PM

Lesnar has held the title since September 18, 2003. That's over four months ago. He'll probably keep it through Wrestlemania, so that would be six months. If he keeps it until the next SD! PPV after WM, which I believe is Judgment Day, that would give him an amazing eight month reign (which is pretty impressive and would be one of the longest reigns in the past few years). He's definitely keeping the belt going into No Way out, which would give him a guaranteed five month reign.

Yeah, it may be obvious to you, but I just kinda realized that.

HOWEVER, it doesn't seem like he's had it forever, at least not for me. What about all of you?

IMO, it doesn't feel like Lesnar's buried every single opponent he's defended the belt again. They've at least kept the main event scene pretty interesting, and it just feels different than when Triple H held the title forever. He's making the belt more prestigious this way (and not just because he's had it for a while, but because of HOW he's had it).

Thoughts? Do you agree, or do you think that Lesnar in fact HAS pulled a Triple H and held the title for a long time, making it worthless (ala Big Show)?

01-29-2004, 05:12 PM	#1
Corkscrewed Posts: 18,357	Lesnar's Had the Title for quite a while Lesnar has held the title since September 18, 2003. That's over four months ago. He'll probably keep it through Wrestlemania, so that would be six months. If he keeps it until the next SD! PPV after WM, which I believe is Judgment Day, that would give him an amazing eight month reign (which is pretty impressive and would be one of the longest reigns in the past few years). He's definitely keeping the belt going into No Way out, which would give him a guaranteed five month reign. Yeah, it may be obvious to you, but I just kinda realized that. HOWEVER, it doesn't seem like he's had it forever, at least not for me. What about all of you? IMO, it doesn't feel like Lesnar's buried every single opponent he's defended the belt again. They've at least kept the main event scene pretty interesting, and it just feels different than when Triple H held the title forever. He's making the belt more prestigious this way (and not just because he's had it for a while, but because of HOW he's had it). Thoughts? Do you agree, or do you think that Lesnar in fact HAS pulled a Triple H and held the title for a long time, making it worthless (ala Big Show)?