Hi, I'm Randy Savage

**dablackguy** · 08-21-2005, 04:09 PM

You may know me from taking steroids, my retarded rap cd, starting shit with Hulk Hogan or those slim jim commericals. The reason I'm here is because I'm the last man to have a title reign longer than 1 year. And I was wondering what do you guys think of that?

Seriously, I think it cheapens the belt like crazy when we have guys walking around "hey, I'm a 8 time champion" or I'm HHH, 10 time champ. I personally think they should being back longer title reigns, but not so long that it becomes stale. I personally think its kinda weak that there's a new champ every 3-6 months because you dont build anything in that time because all you can have in that span is one or two feuds. Maybe some fans would find it boring, but for the purist, it probably would be a good thing. Opinions??

View Poll Results: Which do you prefer?
Title Reigns > 1 year	4	66.67%
Title Reigns < 1 year	2	33.33%
Voters: 6. You must log in or register to vote on this poll.

08-21-2005, 04:09 PM	#1
dablackguy Tacos! Posts: 795	Hi, I'm Randy Savage You may know me from taking steroids, my retarded rap cd, starting shit with Hulk Hogan or those slim jim commericals. The reason I'm here is because I'm the last man to have a title reign longer than 1 year. And I was wondering what do you guys think of that? Seriously, I think it cheapens the belt like crazy when we have guys walking around "hey, I'm a 8 time champion" or I'm HHH, 10 time champ. I personally think they should being back longer title reigns, but not so long that it becomes stale. I personally think its kinda weak that there's a new champ every 3-6 months because you dont build anything in that time because all you can have in that span is one or two feuds. Maybe some fans would find it boring, but for the purist, it probably would be a good thing. Opinions??