NFL 2006 Preview

**BCWWF** · 08-21-2005, 08:35 PM

After last season, I don't see how you can compare Moss and Owens. Owens is good, but he's not a special wide reciever. Randy Moss is a special wide reciever because of his speed, his jumps, and his hands.

That being said, in the four major sports the only time I would consider the athletes giving 100% the whole time is in the NHL playoffs. The way hockey works, you go onto the ice for a minute and work as hard as you can, then you get off. You can't coast through a game of hockey, especially in the playoffs. In football, specifically for a reciever, you can easily coast through plays. Wide recievers don't have to go 100% on every running play or every play where you are running a decoy route. Its just kind of stupid to imply that every reciever, in every game, on every play, is putting 100% into it.

08-21-2005, 08:35 PM	#11
BCWWF The People's Member Posts: 18,092	After last season, I don't see how you can compare Moss and Owens. Owens is good, but he's not a special wide reciever. Randy Moss is a special wide reciever because of his speed, his jumps, and his hands. That being said, in the four major sports the only time I would consider the athletes giving 100% the whole time is in the NHL playoffs. The way hockey works, you go onto the ice for a minute and work as hard as you can, then you get off. You can't coast through a game of hockey, especially in the playoffs. In football, specifically for a reciever, you can easily coast through plays. Wide recievers don't have to go 100% on every running play or every play where you are running a decoy route. Its just kind of stupid to imply that every reciever, in every game, on every play, is putting 100% into it.