Three commentators not a bad idea?

**Kane Knight** · 08-23-2005, 10:35 PM

The idea of having one face announcer, one heel, and one who swings both ways (

) actually does strike me as a good way to go right now, though the choice of folks for commentary is pretty lackluster.

I mean, it's not like it's a new idea, but it can certainly can press certain points better, depending on who the middleman sides with. We already know we're generally going to have a "good guy" and a "bad guy," so the step in between...Useful, or no?

for the sake of this thread, please ignore Who is currently running commentary on Raw.

08-23-2005, 10:35 PM	#1
Kane Knight Ron Paul 4 EVA Posts: 152,467	Three commentators not a bad idea? The idea of having one face announcer, one heel, and one who swings both ways ( ) actually does strike me as a good way to go right now, though the choice of folks for commentary is pretty lackluster. I mean, it's not like it's a new idea, but it can certainly can press certain points better, depending on who the middleman sides with. We already know we're generally going to have a "good guy" and a "bad guy," so the step in between...Useful, or no? for the sake of this thread, please ignore Who is currently running commentary on Raw. �There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old�s life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.� --John Rogers