Remember when Patriot fans compared Tom Brady's contract with Mannings contract?

[BCWWF]

I am not trying to be a dick, but you are obviously trying to prove some point about how the Colts are better than the Patriots, even though you disguise it by asking a question at the end. Teams in the NFL go through cycles, and the Patriots had a really long cycle of being good in which they won three Super Bowls. The Colts haven't even been to a Super Bowl and they just lost a much more significant free agent than the three you listed. The Patriots > the Colts in terms of front office and execution in the playoffs, and until the Colts prove otherwise, that is how it stands.

[RP]

Originally Posted by BCWWF I am not trying to be a dick, but you are obviously trying to prove some point about how the Colts are better than the Patriots, even though you disguise it by asking a question at the end. Teams in the NFL go through cycles, and the Patriots had a really long cycle of being good in which they won three Super Bowls. The Colts haven't even been to a Super Bowl and they just lost a much more significant free agent than the three you listed. The Patriots > the Colts in terms of front office and execution in the playoffs, and until the Colts prove otherwise, that is how it stands.

You're obviously not smart. I asked a specific question in which you still havent answered. This isnt about who's better. This is about what happend to all this BS about Brady leaving money on the table for the players around him to be paid. Obviously that didnt happen.

Also i dont think the Colts losses in player personal even compare to the New England losses. Sure we lost James, but running backs are the most replacable position in the league. New England has lost 3 critical players to there Superbowl success and its starting to show.

The question BCWWF ( since you obviously dont read ) is... Seeing as though the Patriots are well under the cap, why arent they paying these players? Why did Tom Brady leave 30 million on the table?