![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I kind of have to laugh at this whole "certain people won't go to Smackdown" bit, by the way. I mean, WWE made it the B-Show, so now it has a negative reputation attached to it. Of course people aren't going to want to be the second tier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Posts: 61,634
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
The Undertaker has worked on SmackDown! pretty consistently without complaint, as did Kurt Angle. Those two men really deserve credit for that, I think, as they didn't whine about not being on RAW, much like Triple H, Shawn Michaels and Batista apparently have. To answer your question, though, if I were a wrestler and I wanted to prove my absolute worth to the WWE, I'd probably take a SmackDown! assignment without hesitation. Much like some actors may think they can save a crappy movie with their performance, I think there must be some wrestlers out there that thinks they could save SmackDown! with their performance. Plus, SmackDown! has some pretty good writing, a better backstage morale (if you believe reports) and occasionally gets higher ratings. The show is completely salvageable, so if I were a guy with a massive ego, I'd probably give it a shot just to say "Hey, Vince, I'm saving this show." |
|
|
|
|