![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Bent his wookie
Posts: 1,420
|
as a ford guy, i see where your going with this.....the gt500 currently produced is not REALLY a gt500 like they used to make them, its fast, and looks like one, but to ford fans, its not.
BTW fallen angel, you got a mustang by chance? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
ELF ANGEL
Posts: 39,476
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
I have to laugh, Really I do, Because your stating directly the point Im trying to get across, as an argument against me. Yes, they look completely different, and thats why I said classic muscle cars should stay as classic muscle cars. Todays Charger and 1970's Charger looks completely different, and my opinion is that todays is inferior in looks to its predecessor, thats one of the biggest reasons I hate updated looks to classic cars, it takes away its rugged look in exchange for a sleek look. Maybe in 30 years time, I may think that the 2007 Charger is a cool looking car, but I will still likely think that the 60 year old Charger is alot better. Quote:
And no I dont, I dont own a car. But my top 3 3) 1972 - Chev Olds Cutlass 2) 1967 - Mustang GT500 1) 1970 - Pontiac GTO |
||
|
|
|