03-24-2008, 08:12 AM
|
#6
|
|
You can't teach that
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noid
Edge is not undefeated at WrestleMania. You win, you lose or you draw. Edge was not a winner in a match where there was a winner, hence he is a loser. Is the definition of being undefeated that you have never lost? If it still is, then Edge is not undefeated at WrestleMania.
Now, it's all well and good to say "but he has never lost a match by pinfall or submission!" But fuck, how many matches has Edge won by pinfall or submission at WrestleMania? Two. Only one of those (vs. Booker T at WrestleMania X-8 in his hometown) was contested under normal rules.
Congratulations, Edge. You have one win at WrestleMania that is relevant to the kind of match you are working at WrestleMania. This would be fantastic if Edge was talking himself up as a great WrestleMania competitor, and the commentators were pointing out the flaws in his argument (WrestleMania loss; style of matches, etc.), but they're not.
The focus of this feud should be on two questions: From Edge's perspective, it should be whether or not he can end The Undertaker's streak? From The Undertaker's perspective, it should be whether or not he can be the first man to wrestle the World Heavyweight Title away from Edge (his first reign was ended by forfeit)? Edge should be teasing that he cares more about the World Heavyweight Championship than his WrestleMania record, and will get himself counted out or DQ'd to keep it.
World Heavyweight Title first; streak second.
|
Nice!
When I start a promotion, Ill give you a spot on the booking team, but I there will be serious limits in place to prevent a Goldberg streak going to a Basham.
|
|
|