I hate the IWC sometimes...

[Loose Cannon]

I saw the PPV. I thought the attack on Punk was a great way to take the belt off of him without making him lose the belt. It's been done in wrestling before and it sets up a chase program. and it can be a chase for the title or towards a goal lik defeating Orton. Jericho winning was well deserved for him having the feud of the year with HBK. Poor booking or not, whatever. They can book the shittiest of the shittiest and I've learned over the past few years that the WWE will contnue to generate $$$ for whatever they throw out on camera. It doesn't matter anymore. They've become so huge that the company could give two shits if thier program is logically correct

speaking of credibility though, if you want to have that argument, I think the whole scramle match really lessens the Title's cred. For fuck's sake, The belt goes back and forth with people getting beat left and right. It's insane. The belt has been a prop forever, but it really became a prop in those matches. how the heck do you look strong coming out of that match?? I think Punk was definately better off not working that match tbh. it's built for a sneaky pinfall like Jericho's.

anyway, on the topic, just don't take the comments on here to heart. enjoy the show or don't enjoy the show, but don't let a message board get to you

[Mr. Nerfect]

Originally Posted by Loose Cannon I saw the PPV. I thought the attack on Punk was a great way to take the belt off of him without making him lose the belt. It's been done in wrestling before and it sets up a chase program. and it can be a chase for the title or towards a goal lik defeating Orton. Jericho winning was well deserved for him having the feud of the year with HBK. Poor booking or not, whatever. They can book the shittiest of the shittiest and I've learned over the past few years that the WWE will contnue to generate $$$ for whatever they throw out on camera. It doesn't matter anymore. They've become so huge that the company could give two shits if thier program is logically correct speaking of credibility though, if you want to have that argument, I think the whole scramle match really lessens the Title's cred. For fuck's sake, The belt goes back and forth with people getting beat left and right. It's insane. The belt has been a prop forever, but it really became a prop in those matches. how the heck do you look strong coming out of that match?? I think Punk was definately better off not working that match tbh. it's built for a sneaky pinfall like Jericho's. anyway, on the topic, just don't take the comments on here to heart. enjoy the show or don't enjoy the show, but don't let a message board get to you

Someone who speaks sense.

[Rob]

Originally Posted by Loose Cannon I saw the PPV. I thought the attack on Punk was a great way to take the belt off of him without making him lose the belt.

If it was Shawn Michaels or Triple H not dropping a belt in the ring in this manner, people wouldn't be saying it was a good way of getting the belt off the champion and you know it.