![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Part time poster
Posts: 22,963
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Aside from the second being an impressive sequel (it was ok but nothing special for me), I'd agree entirely with this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
How anyone can say that 3 was their favourite I'll never know! They seemed to replace any sense of plot or sense with a nice pile of "EXTRA SUPER GORE". That shit doesn't interest me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Diabetes Coming To Getcha
Posts: 6,826
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Take Bourne Ultimatum for example, that started as an action scene, then talk, then an action scene with talk, then more talk, then another action scene then a fight scene, then more talk... Saw III is really the middle of the whole franchise. If you watch Saw II up and think of it as one big movie, Saw III is the gore/action of the whole series. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|