So let me get this right...(I would say TNA spoilers, but TNA is spoiled goods anyhow

**Jeritron** · 12-15-2008, 11:54 AM

I think heel stables are better in smaller numbers to be honest. All stables, for that matter.
Anything over 5 members becomes ridiculous, overdone, pales in comparison to the original formation, and also becomes a burden to creative.
It's no coincidence that the Corporate-Ministry, The Alliance, The Millionaire's Club, 100 member NWO, and other huge factions were misfires. On the other hand, the greatest stables like the 4 horsemen, DX, original nWo, Evolution, and the original Corporation were among the greatest.

A stable does mean strength in numbers, yes, but it doesn't have to be large numbers. Just 3-5. Really all you need is your headliner, and a well rounded group of guys surrounding him. A couple solid cronies or a tag team, a hoss, a mid level guy, and maybe a mouth peice.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

12-15-2008, 11:54 AM	#17
Jeritron Get a poke on Posts: 35,234	I think heel stables are better in smaller numbers to be honest. All stables, for that matter. Anything over 5 members becomes ridiculous, overdone, pales in comparison to the original formation, and also becomes a burden to creative. It's no coincidence that the Corporate-Ministry, The Alliance, The Millionaire's Club, 100 member NWO, and other huge factions were misfires. On the other hand, the greatest stables like the 4 horsemen, DX, original nWo, Evolution, and the original Corporation were among the greatest. A stable does mean strength in numbers, yes, but it doesn't have to be large numbers. Just 3-5. Really all you need is your headliner, and a well rounded group of guys surrounding him. A couple solid cronies or a tag team, a hoss, a mid level guy, and maybe a mouth peice.