Hypothetical: Options in Fighting Games

[.44 Magdalene]

This
Capcom vs Adult Swim
A Combo Discussion

And you got from SRK about what you got from here in regards to your 3 Character fighting game idea, in that "...Err, sure, I guess, but that's not really new. At all."

Can you confirm Dan Hibiki doesn't need his EXs? I mean, if we're going to play that game, then I would think burden of proof lies on the guy wanting to make changes to the present game design, but grasping burden of proof insinuates that you can make a cohesive argument without relying on stall tactics and massive fallacies. You've already admitted that Gouken and Akuma can't function without super bars without playing around with the rest of the game mechanics, which means... err... that you can't just make it an on/off switch. That, plus the Dan thing--see burden of proof, above, makes at least three characters that would themselves have to be heavily played with mechanically to adjust to the absence of something you deem unnecessary.

Lol, elitism and stagnant comfort. That is amusing. I can't imagine driving the wrong way down a one-way street and thinking to myself--as all these cars drive in the opposite direction, honking and swerving--that I'm the only motherfucker here that knows about driving.

[Kalyx triaD]

Originally Posted by .44 Magdalene This Capcom vs Adult Swim A Combo Discussion

- The idea of options in SF4 is mix received in the SRK thread. And I'm not sure what makes you think they're more "talented, experienced, etc".

- They waved off Cvs[as] as "Street Fighter vs Anime" with the grand irony being that Capcom eventually made a game that was just that - and they fucking love it. Not the best case to try and use against me. I also wouldn't call them "experienced, talented, competitive gamers" either.

- The combo discussion wasn't a "big idea". Funny you bring that up anyway as it's another example of your fighting game know-nothingness. Tekken 6 is defined by combos and juggles now. But we don't wanna swim in that pool again, right?

And you got from SRK about what you got from here in regards to your 3 Character fighting game idea, in that "...Err, sure, I guess, but that's not really new. At all."

That's not even close to the replies I got.

Can you confirm Dan Hibiki doesn't need his EXs? I mean, if we're going to play that game, then I would think burden of proof lies on the guy wanting to make changes to the present game design, but grasping burden of proof insinuates that you can make a cohesive argument without relying on stall tactics and massive fallacies.

You are completely right. The burden of proof is on me. Me vs your roommate. I'll use Dan, no EX, Supers or Ultras. He'll have to do the same. And while we have that meta-game match, my point would be proven through activity - AS WE ARE PLAYING THE GAME SANS EX, SUPERS, AND ULTRAS. THAT'S MY FUCKING POINT.

Lol, elitism and stagnant comfort. That is amusing. I can't imagine driving the wrong way down a one-way street and thinking to myself--as all these cars drive in the opposite direction, honking and swerving--that I'm the only motherfucker here that knows about driving.

*buzzer* Try again.

Games are sold to people. They take it home and enjoy them. You can't do that with roads. Roads are outside and mostly public. We all have to obey rules of the road that govern us all. With games I you can change the rules that affect me and whoever else joins me. I'm glad I can help you with what must have been a blurry line for you.