![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Posts: 3,755
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's not so much the ratings or the ages of the guys involved so much as the product. TNA has been infamously known for producing lackluster television with poor booking, poor character development, and an unclear direction. How many times has AJ Styles been heel or face over the last 2 or 3 years? You can't expect people to invest in your product if you have no clear direction in terms of the company. TNA has been WCW-lite well before Hogan and Bischoff got there, and now it seems more prominent.
The PG rating is crap, but it doesn't necessarily take away from the product. At the moment, Raw is getting better by the week with interesting storylines and an actual purpose for each show. Even it's only because Mania's right around the corner, the consensus seems to be that Raw has taken a turn for the better for the last 2 weeks. SmackDown! continues to be the best and most consistently booked "wrestling" show around. That's what a wrestling program should be. Outside of R-Truth getting what seems to be a prominent push (and even then, people have made efforts to justify such), SmackDown! is getting positive responses here week in and week out. Not to mention, we all have the right to our opinion, and if a wrestling show sucks, like Raw and TNA has, then there's nothing wrong with pointing that out. Why would we settle? If you don't like to read negative, and often justified complaints, then don't read. Last edited by Damian Rey; 02-11-2010 at 01:08 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |