UFC 112 Discussion

**KillerWolf** · 04-13-2010, 08:17 PM

This is what Dana White and the UFC should be appologizing for:

UFC 112 in general. i mean, it was a shitty card. and they've been putting on a lot of shitty fight cards lately. a lot of people will say, "yeah, well, they're following a business model that calls for them to pump out as many PPVs as possible." that really shouldnt make you happy. that's like judging the merits of a motion picture by how well it does at the box office.

they do more than one PPV per month. instead of 1 great card in the month of May, we get two mediocre to pretty good cards. and on and on it goes like this. the fight cards are getting to be pretty damned watered down IMO. congradulations to the UFC for the fact that they can put out such a big number of events, but personally, i'd be happier with half the number of PPVs.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

04-13-2010, 08:17 PM	#19
KillerWolf \m/(-.-)\m/ Posts: 1,456	This is what Dana White and the UFC should be appologizing for: UFC 112 in general. i mean, it was a shitty card. and they've been putting on a lot of shitty fight cards lately. a lot of people will say, "yeah, well, they're following a business model that calls for them to pump out as many PPVs as possible." that really shouldnt make you happy. that's like judging the merits of a motion picture by how well it does at the box office. they do more than one PPV per month. instead of 1 great card in the month of May, we get two mediocre to pretty good cards. and on and on it goes like this. the fight cards are getting to be pretty damned watered down IMO. congradulations to the UFC for the fact that they can put out such a big number of events, but personally, i'd be happier with half the number of PPVs.