![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Doin' It Right
Posts: 35,461
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
sick burn, Dr. Perfect!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Pope Is Pimpin'
Posts: 4,676
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You dumb fucks, all I hear on this forum is "this shit sucks" or "why are they bringing back old guys?!?!" Now, in this particular thread, I read let's bring back Paul Heyman. Are you fucking smarks Bi-polar? Maybe what TNA needs is some fresh new ideas from new people. Bring back Paul Heyman, yeah that will work...... how is his creation ECW doing.... Ohh wait, it fucking went under. You smarks are fucking retarded.:foc:
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: 3,033
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Maybe some of you folks don't understand the difference between the BUSINESS and CREATIVE sides. Paul Heyman was in charge of ECW's creative and business sides. True, ECW failed and went under, but ECW went under due to the poor business decisions Paul Heyman made, not the creative decisions. How can some of you not grasp this simple concept? Paul Heyman has a great creative mind in the wrestling business, but he's not a great business man. So from a creative standpoint, I think he could be a great asset to TNA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Daddy's Home
Posts: 2,967
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|