What makes Flair 'the man'?

[ColdwaVer]

Originally Posted by PureHatred PS...it's a predetermined sport. Titles are meaningless unless asa relative measure of who is the most marketable at any given time.

I wouldn't call them entirely meaningless, what you have to look at is the fact that through Flairs' many reigns, the fans continued to flock to him. Ability to draw as a champion isn't a predetermined factor, and the fact that the majority of Flair's runs were successes (or at least not total duds) is indicative of something. Ask yourself: when has Flair ever really dropped the ball?

[PureHatred]

Originally Posted by ColdwaVer I wouldn't call them entirely meaningless, what you have to look at is the fact that through Flairs' many reigns, the fans continued to flock to him. Ability to draw as a champion isn't a predetermined factor, and the fact that the majority of Flair's runs were successes (or at least not total duds) is indicative of something. Ask yourself: when has Flair ever really dropped the ball?

Did you read what I wrote? They are meaningles except as a means of measuring who is marketable; i.e. drawing power. Thanks for vigorously agreeing with me.