![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: How many rumble participants? | |||
| Classical 30 Man |
|
16 | 38.10% |
| Stick with 40 Man |
|
13 | 30.95% |
| Really go classic...20 Man |
|
2 | 4.76% |
| Go the World War 3 route and stick it to WCW: 60 Man |
|
11 | 26.19% |
| Voters: 42. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Posts: 6,350
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
They should have a 30-man Royal Rumble, BUT, instead of it being that whoever is thrown over the rope to the outside be eliminated, have all 30 guys start on the outside, and whoever is thrown INTO the ring, is eliminated.
It'd be awesome because everyone who is thrown into the ring, is going to have to just stand there 'til the whole thing is over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: 3,743
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Since it was 40 last year they might as well go with it again i'd hate for ADR to be the only superstar to win one even though he came in really late.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
It's High Noon!
Posts: 15,703
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|