Why is Randy Orton not a Top Player?

[Heyman]

Randy Orton is great, but.............

I personally believe that Randy Orton is great. Why? Because - despite the fact that he's a face, his character hasn't really lost any of its 'edge'. His character is constant. He is very similar to Undertaker, Kane, and Triple H, in this regard.

Unfortunately - the WWE missed the boat in making Randy a "mega star" in my opinion........twice.

In 2004 after Randy Orton defeated Chris Benoit at Summerslam, and at Wrestlemania 25 when Orton lost to Triple H.

In both cases, Orton could have really skyrocket to the next level.........but bad booking and bad character transition really hurt him.

In 2004 - it was due to a premature face turn.......a face turn that lead to a very significant alteration of character and a complete loss of 'edge'.

At Wrestlemania 25, he should have gone over Triple H cleanly.......and should have continued to be a complete badass as a dominant heel. Remember that one RAW where he got that crazy look in his eye and almost kicked Stephanie McMahon in the head? (to the point where Dibiase and Rhodes even had to hold him back). THAT was perfect........and the WWE should have booked Orton to kick Stephanie in the head.

At current - Orton is a strong competitor for the WWE and would not be out of place as a World title contender, but the WWE could have and should have done so much more with Orton. He could have and should have been a lot bigger.

If the WWE aren't careful, they are going to ruin their potential with CM Punk as well.