HUGE UPSET

[Nicky Fives]

Why even have judges? If the fight goes the distance, just call it a draw..... there would be no controversy in that..... same thing goes for MMA.... fighters would oonly be paid half their purse and would motivate them to finish the fight......

[The Show Off]

Originally Posted by Nicky Fives Why even have judges? If the fight goes the distance, just call it a draw..... there would be no controversy in that..... same thing goes for MMA.... fighters would oonly be paid half their purse and would motivate them to finish the fight......

This does make some sense. The only problem is people will stop tuning in after the the third or fourth main event in a row that's a draw.

[CSL]

Originally Posted by Keith Ortiz is now fighting Alvarez, and Arum said a rematch between Pacquiao and Bradley is "unlikely". My guess is they set up a fight between Bradley and Miguel Cotto, Cotto wins, and then faces Pacquiao.

don't see that, Manny already murdered Cotto

Originally Posted by Nicky Fives Why even have judges? If the fight goes the distance, just call it a draw..... there would be no controversy in that..... same thing goes for MMA.... fighters would oonly be paid half their purse and would motivate them to finish the fight......

ridiculous idea

[Next Big Thing]

Originally Posted by Nicky Fives Why even have judges? If the fight goes the distance, just call it a draw..... there would be no controversy in that..... same thing goes for MMA.... fighters would oonly be paid half their purse and would motivate them to finish the fight......

That's a terrible idea. There are plenty of fights where it's clear who won and a draw would be just as stupid as the judges awarding a victory to the guy who got his ass kicked for most of the fight. Some of the greatest fights of all time were ones that went the distance and ended in a decision.