![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Is Finkle
Posts: 88,981
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Once again, they are going to use a guy winning the WORLD TITLE and then losing it to get him more over than he was before. Instead of making him over before he wins the belt in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
The fact that the name is kind of unwieldy is just another strike against WWE creative. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm not COMPLETELY against the idea of having MITB in general but this seems to be how they actually want to use it. They go out of their way to actually de-push a guy before giving them the title. Even with WWE's writers, I can't imagine what the thought process is here.
|
|
|
|