![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Best Poster
Posts: 57,067
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Without a doubt yes. Andre didn't win many titles because he didn't have to. Also, it would mean that someone would have had to defeat Andre. He was unquestionably the biggest draw of the 70's/early 80's. Vince Sr would lend him out to other territories to bring in other big stars like Dusty Rhodes, Harley Race etc....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
To be honest, I do think a legit case can be made for Andre The Giant being "on the same level" as Austin, Rock, and Hogan. I'm just not really sure if Andre really "revolutionized" wrestling however (although I could be wrong). Hulk Hogan was the guy that made wrestling cool and brought in new legions of fans. Austin was the guy that made wrestling cool again........and brought in new legions of fans. The Rock continued Austin's momentum when Austin got injured in 1999. Hogan and The Rock became massive stars outside of the WWE as well, and became legit celebrities outside of the wrestling world. I just don't know if Andre the Giant is in that category, but again, I'd have no problems with him being listed as a '5'. As #1wwf-fan pointed out, Andre is a lot closer to Hogan/Austin/Rock level than he is Bret/Shawn/Taker. Maybe Andre is a 4.85?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Best Poster
Posts: 57,067
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Last edited by Bad News Gertner; 02-11-2015 at 09:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Hmmmmm............. Based on that description, I guess I would put Andre at a 5.0; as I'm sure most wrestling experts would as well. |
|
|
|
|