seth rollins is 18% of the way to pedro morales

[The CyNick]

Originally Posted by DAMN iNATOR Alright, we'll do your little comparison YOUR WAY, in a 3 month timespan. Sure HHH lost to Vince on 9/16/1999 edition of SD!, but he didn't get a chance for a rematch only because with Vince as then-WWF owner, it was a conflict of interest for him to hold his own company's World title. Even still, he won back his title later that month at Unforgiven and was rarely pinned between mid-September and mid-December 1999...he only lost by pinfall 4 times in 21 singles matches in that timeframe (or, ironically, 19%, the same percentage NS somehow figures Rollins is to the length of Morales' reign, LMAO), as compared to Rollins, who from between mid-July and Monday night, has lost 11 out of 39 matches, or 28% of the time, nearly 10% more than late-1999 Triple H! Why do you suppose that is? Could it be that Vince and co. backstage really DON'T have as much confidence in Seth Rollins as modern-day champion as they did in late-1999 Triple H? Or will you accuse me of some logical fallacy you perceive in my response because you just always HAVE to be right, or because you don't realize that the booking was far superior back then, even if between mid-September and mid-December 1999 Triple H only held the belt for ~ 2 months out of 3, despite winning over 80% of his singles matches?

Are you comparing singles matches to singles matches?